State Election Tuesday, November 8 – How to Vote & Ballot Information
There is no school on Tuesday, November 8 due to a Teacher Professional Day timed as usual to coincide with election day. Because the polls are located at the Middle School, this reduces parking & traffic congestion and increases student safety on this busy day. There are four statewide ballot questions this year, in addition to the state midterm election. All Hopkinton precincts vote at the Hopkinton Middle School Brown Gym, 88 Hayden Rowe St, Hopkinton, enter by Grove Street. Polls are open 7:00am-8:00pm.
Voting Options
Option 1 – Vote In-Person on Election Day
Vote Tuesday, November 8, 2022 between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm at the Hopkinton Middle School Brown Gym, 88 Hayden Rowe St, Hopkinton, enter by Grove Street.
Option 2 – Vote Early In-Person
Date | Time | Location |
---|---|---|
Sat., Oct. 22 | 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Mon., Oct. 24 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Tues., Oct. 25 | 8:00 AM – 7:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Wed., Oct. 26 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Thurs., Oct. 27 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Fri., Oct. 28 | 8:00 AM – 2:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Sat., Oct. 29 | 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Mon., Oct. 31 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Tues., Nov. 1 | 8:00 AM – 7:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Wed., Nov. 2 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Thurs., Nov. 3 | 8:00 AM – 4:30 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Fri., Nov. 4 | 8:00 AM – 2:00 PM | Town Hall, 18 Main St, Hopkinton |
Option 3 – Vote Early by Mail
Unlike absentee voting, early vote by mail requires no excuse. You will receive your application by mail. The application submission deadline is November 1 but you’re advised to submit it earlier to allow time to receive your ballot, fill it out, and submit it on time. You may either mail your ballot or drop it into the special box in front of Town Hall. Once you submit your ballot you may track your ballot online.
ON THE NOVEMBER 8 BALLOT FOR HOPKINTON RESIDENTS:
GOVERNOR AND LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, Vote for not more than 1
- DIEHL AND ALLEN, REPUBLICAN
- HEALEY AND DRISCOLL, DEMOCRATIC
- REED AND EVERETT, LIBERTARIAN
ATTORNEY GENERAL, Vote for not more than 1
- ANDREA JOY CAMPBELL 37 Groveland St., Boston, DEMOCRATIC
- JAMES R. McMAHON, III 14 Canal View Rd., Bourne, REPUBLICAN
SECRETARY OF STATE, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN 46 Lake St., Boston, DEMOCRATIC
- RAYLA CAMPBELL 397 High St., Whitman, REPUBLICAN
- JUAN SANCHEZ 40 Suffolk St., Holyoke, GREEN-RAINBOW
TREASURER, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- DEBORAH B. GOLDBERG 37 Hyslop Rd., Brookline, DEMOCRATIC
- CRISTINA CRAWFORD 100 Prospect St., Sherborn, LIBERTARIAN
AUDITOR, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- ANTHONY AMORE 247 Washington St., Winchester, REPUBLICAN
- DIANA DiZOGLIO 30 Olive St., Methuen, DEMOCRATIC
- GLORIA A. CABALLERO-ROCA 5 Whiting Ave., Holyoke, GREEN-RAINBOW
- DOMINIC GIANNONE, III 58 Birchbrow Ave., Weymouth, WORKERS PARTY
- DANIEL WERNER RIEK 9 Breezy Point Rd., Yarmouth, LIBERTARIAN
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS Second DISTRICT, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- JAMES P. McGOVERN 393 Burncoat St., Worcester, DEMOCRATIC
- JEFFREY A. SOSSA-PAQUETTE 9 Meadow Ln., Shrewsbury, REPUBLICAN
COUNCILLOR SECOND DISTRICT, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- ROBERT L. JUBINVILLE 487 Adams St., Milton, DEMOCRATIC
- DASHE M. VIDEIRA 35 Marvin Ave., Franklin, REPUBLICAN
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT SECOND MIDDLESEX & NORFOLK DISTRICT, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- KAREN E. SPILKA 18 Rome Way, Ashland, DEMOCRATIC
REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT EIGHTH MIDDLESEX DISTRICT, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- JAMES C. ARENA-DeROSA 9 Mechanic St., Holliston, DEMOCRATIC
- LORING BARNES 191 Curve St., Millis, REPUBLICAN
DISTRICT ATTORNEY NORTHERN DISTRICT, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- MARIAN T. RYAN 8 Bradford Rd., Belmont, DEMOCRATIC
SHERIFF MIDDLESEX COUNTY, VOTE FOR NOT MORE THAN 1
- PETER J. KOUTOUJIAN 33 Harris St., Waltham, DEMOCRATIC
QUESTION 1: Proposed Amendment to the Constitution
Do you approve of the adoption of an amendment to the constitution summarized below, which was approved
by the General Court in joint sessions of the two houses on June 12, 2019 (yeas 147 – nays 48); and again on
June 9, 2021 (yeas 159 – nays 41)?
Summary
This proposed constitutional amendment would establish an additional 4% state income tax on that portion of annual taxable income in excess of $1 million. This income level would be adjusted annually, by the same method used for federal income-tax brackets, to reflect increases in the cost of living. Revenues from this tax would be used, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature, for public education, public colleges and universities; and for the repair and maintenance of roads, bridges, and public transportation. The proposed amendment would apply to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2023.
- A YES VOTE would amend the state Constitution to impose an additional 4% tax on that portion of incomes over one million dollars to be used, subject to appropriation by the state Legislature, on education and transportation. https://www.fairsharema.com/
- A NO VOTE would make no change in the state Constitution relative to income tax. https://www.noquestion1.com/
Question 2: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of
Representatives on or before May 3, 2022?
Summary
This proposed law would direct the Commissioner of the Massachusetts Division of Insurance to approve or disapprove the rates of dental benefit plans and would require that a dental insurance carrier meet an annual aggregate medical loss ratio for its covered dental benefit plans of 83 percent. The medical loss ratio would measure the amount of premium dollars a dental insurance carrier spends on its members’ dental expenses and quality improvements, as opposed to administrative expenses. If a carrier’s annual aggregate medical loss ratio is less than 83 percent, the carrier would be required to refund the excess premiums to its covered individuals and groups. The proposed law would allow the Commissioner to waive or adjust the refunds only if it is determined that issuing refunds would result in financial impairment for the carrier…
A YES VOTE would regulate dental insurance rates, including by requiring companies to spend at least 83% of premiums on member dental expenses and quality improvements instead of administrative expenses, and by making other changes to dental insurance regulations. https://www.fairdentalinsurance.org/
A NO VOTE would make no change in the law relative to the regulations that apply to dental insurance companies. https://protectmydentalcare.com/
QUESTION 3: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives on or before May 3, 2022?
Summary
This proposed law would increase the statewide limits on the combined number of licenses for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption (including licenses for “all alcoholic beverages” and for “wines and malt beverages”) that any one retailer could own or control: from 9 to 12 licenses in 2023; to 15 licenses in 2027; and to 18 licenses in 2031…
A YES VOTE would increase the number of licenses a retailer could have for the sale of alcoholic beverages to be consumed off premises, limit the number of “all-alcoholic beverages” licenses that a retailer could acquire, restrict use of self-checkout, and require retailers to accept customers’ out-of-state identification. https://www.masspack.org/
A NO VOTE would make no change in the laws governing the retail sale of alcoholic beverages. https://www.foodstoresma.org/
QUESTION 4: REFERENDUM ON AN EXISTING LAW
Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was approved by the House of Representatives and the Senate on May 26, 2022?
Summary
This law allows Massachusetts residents who cannot provide proof of lawful presence in the United States to obtain a standard driver’s license or learner’s permit if they meet all the other qualifications for a standard license or learner’s permit, including a road test and insurance, and provide proof of their identity, date of birth, and residency. The law provides that, when processing an application for such a license or learner’s permit or motor vehicle registration, the registrar of motor vehicles may not ask about or create a record of the citizenship or immigration status of the applicant, except as otherwise required by law. This law does not allow people who cannot provide proof of lawful presence in the United States to obtain a REAL ID…
A YES VOTE would keep in place the law, which would allow Massachusetts residents who cannot provide proof of lawful presence in the United States to obtain a driver’s license or permit if they meet the other requirements for doing so. https://saferroadsma.com/
A NO VOTE would repeal this law. https://www.fairandsecurema.com/